Apple's iPhone was the talk of the town after its January 9 launch. Industry observers were by and large impressed with the new device, praising its user interface, innovation, and seamless integration. But two senior ABI Research analysts -- wireless research director Stuart Carlaw, and principal mobile broadband analyst Philip Solis -- point out that while the iPhone is undoubtedly clever and capable, it is not correct to call it a smartphone, as much of the media has done.
ABI Research defines a smartphone as a cellular handset using an open, commercial operating system that supports third party applications. The iPhone runs the Apple Macintosh computer operating system, OS X, so at first glance it would seem to fall into the smartphone category, which might help justify its announced $500+ pricetag. But, says Solis, "It turns out that this device will be closed to third party applications. Therefore we must conclude at this point that, based on our current definition, the iPhone is not a smartphone: it is a very high-end feature phone."
Feature phones' functionality (dictated by the software which controls the hardware) is closed and controlled by an operator or the device manufacturer, whereas smartphones are supported by a third-party ecosystem, where competition in the software space creates applications that add value. "Sure," concedes Solis, "feature phones have third party applications too - but these are relatively weak and limited applications that work with the middleware such as Java and BREW. Applications designed for smartphones can be written to access core functionality from the OS itself, and are therefore usually more powerful and efficient. The competition in an open environment also yields more cutting edge, rich applications."
Stuart Carlaw adds, "Consumers will not be willing to settle for a second-rate cell phone just to have superior music. Apple must get the phone engineering part of the equation right, and it is difficult to see how they will accomplish that with no track record in the industry. Even though they are working with some prominent suppliers, the task of putting all of the building blocks together cannot be underestimated."
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(97)
-
▼
01
(77)
- The “iPhone” Brouhaha
- New multifeature iPhone not likely to be a huge hit
- Make Your Own iPhone
- Cisco Troubles With iPhone Trademark in Canada
- iPhone could be exclusive to Carphone Warehouse
- Researcher: iPhone is no smart phone
- Apple's 'iPhone' problems in Canada
- Researcher: iPhone no smart phone
- The iPhone is No Smartphone - Report
- iPhone: HP gets 'touchy'
- How the iPhone could have changed the cell-phone i...
- Needham: iPhone takes shine off RIM's Pearl
- Reviews the iPhone (Verdict: Groundbreaking, Expen...
- Apple: Introducing iPhone
- Apple’s iPhone touch-screen – will it work as adve...
- Toshiba eyes faster chips to win in iPhone era
- iPhone Hang-Ups
- No Cingular, no iPhone
- iPhone trademarks: the real issues
- iPhone and Apple TV for Enterprise Mac readers
- Will iPhone Mess Up Cell Phones Upgrade Cycle?
- Can iPhone game too?
- Apple in Profit with iPhone
- Cisco admits iPhone licence violation
- Apple iPhone Could Enjoy Profit Margins Over 50%
- iPhone Trademarks: the Real Issues
- Is Apple's iPhone set to conquer the world?
- iPhone To Energize Development Of Cellular Media D...
- iPhone Comparisons to LG PRADA Debate Reaches Dull...
- Apple's iPhone PK LG's Prada
- Apple iPhone courts failure with a late, defensive...
- Apple's bite: For iPhone, uPay 100% markup
- Will iPhone be for you? Here's what to expect
- Apple's iPhone a victim of telecom network limitat...
- Critics already dialing in with iPhone complaints
- Intel exec claims iPhone runs on Xscale chip
- An iPhone FAQ
- Apple iPhone FAQ_2
- Apple iPhone FAQ
- David Pogue Updates iPhone FAQ
- How'd we go from topophone to iPhone?
- Apple stands to make a bundle from iPhone
- Crave Podcast 19: The iPhone is here!
- Apple iPhone Raises the Bar for Handset Interfaces
- Microsoft to Sue Apple over iPhone
- Price cuts on Apple iPhone likely, analysis finds
- Analysts: IPhone Prices May Go Down
- Is the Google Switch mobile phone an iPhone killer?
- Apple iPhone Won't Work In Much Of Northern N.E
- IPhone a 'big letdown' for some in Northeast
- Apple set for 50% margins on iPhone, says iSuppli
- Will Apple's iPhone Measure Up to the Hype?
- iPhone accessories out already?
- The iPhone is not as clever as Steve thinks
- LG unwraps iPhone-like Prada cell phone
- Hands (and fingers) on the iPhone
- Cisco's iPhone violates GPL, expert says
- Up close with the iPhone
- Is Apple's iPhone a Technical Coup?
- iPhone fans and foes clash online
- Apple's iPhone faces hang-up in 19 states
- Microsoft CEO Takes On Apple's iPhone
- Apple Lawyers Target Blogs Covering iPhone "Skins"...
- Apple holiday sales, earnings soar, but current qu...
- Why Apple needs the iPhone (and the Mac): iPod gro...
- Apple reports record 1Q profit
- Apple iPhone: our in-depth, hands-off impressions
- Report: iPhone won't be sold in many parts of country
- Apple iPhone Won't Be Available In Vermont, N.H.
- iPhone network won't work for all
- Macworld: Will Apple Keep its iPhone Closed? Multi...
- iPhone Skins for Windows Mobile Phones & PalmOS Ke...
- Is iPhone Apple's greatest triumph or last hurrah?
- iPhone misconceptions corrected
- The widescreen iPhone -- not so widescreen
- iPhone Clone On Ebay
- Want an iPhone? Beware the iHandcuffs!
-
▼
01
(77)