Few products have been launched with such a blizzard of publicity as the iPhone from Apple Inc.
To its many fans, Apple is more a religious cult than a company. An iToaster that downloads music while toasting bread probably would get the same kind of worldwide attention.
Don't let that fool you into thinking that it matters. The big competitors in the mobile phone industry, including Nokia Oyj and Motorola Inc., won't be nervous over a new threat to their business.
The iPhone is nothing more than a luxury bauble that will appeal to a few gadget freaks. In terms of its impact on the industry, the iPhone is less relevant. Advertisement
If column inches and airtime guaranteed commercial success, Apple already would have a global hit on its hands. In recent weeks, it has been impossible to open a newspaper or look at a website without reading something about the shiny new phone.
Certainly, it looks like a nice piece of equipment. The iPhone combines Apple's iPod music and video player with a mobile phone as well as having wireless Internet access for e-mail.
Instead of lugging around a phone for making calls, an MP3 player for listening to music, and a Blackberry for checking your e-mail, you can do all three on one device. Even better, you only need one charger.
It will be released in the U.S. in June, with a rollout to the rest of the world later, and will cost $499 to $599, depending on how much storage space you want. How many might sell? Ten million in 2008, according to Apple's chief executive, Steve Jobs.
Not everyone is sold on the idea. "The iPhone will not substantially alter the fundamental structure and challenges of the mobile industry," Charles Golvin, an analyst at Forrester Research Inc., said in a report this month.
There are three reasons that Apple is unlikely to make much of an impact on this market — and why it's too early to start dumping your Nokia shares.
•Apple is late to this party. The company didn't invent the personal computer or MP3 player, but it was among the pioneers of both products. Yet there is no shortage of phones out there. There already are big companies that dominate the space, all of whom will defend their turf. That means Apple will have to fight hard for every sale.
•The mobile phone industry depends on cooperation with the big networks. Phones — the high-end ones in particular — usually are sold with a network contract.
The provider subsidizes the handset and hopes to recoup its money with ridiculously expensive charges for calls and data. Yet Apple has never been good at working with other companies. If it knew how to do that, it would be Microsoft Corp.
On top of that, its rivals will be pulling out all the stops to prevent the networks from offering iPhones. Sure, a big operator such as Vodafone Group PLC would like an exclusive deal to sell the iPhone in, say, the U.K. market. Against that, how much does it want to annoy Nokia — and what kind of incentives will Nokia be offering not to go with the Apple product?
There will be lots of tough conversations between companies that know each other well. Apple will find it hard to win those negotiations.
•iPhone is a defensive product. It is mainly designed to protect the iPod, which is coming under attack from mobile manufacturers adding music players to their handsets. Yet defensive products usually don't work — consumers are interested in new things, not reheated versions of old things.
Likewise, at whom is it pitched? The price and the e-mail features make it look like a business product. However, Apple is a consumer company. Will your accounting department spring for a fancy new handset just so you can listen to Eminem on your way to a business meeting?
In many ways, that is a shame. The mobile-phone industry is becoming a cozy cartel among network operators and a limited range of manufacturers. It could certainly use a blast of competition from an industry outsider.
It may come — but probably from an entrepreneurial startup somewhere. How about phones with fewer gadgets but better at making calls? Or with never-ending batteries? Or chargers that don't weigh three times as much as the phone?
It won't come from the iPhone. Apple will sell a few to its fans, but the iPhone won't make a long-term mark.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(97)
-
▼
01
(77)
- The “iPhone” Brouhaha
- New multifeature iPhone not likely to be a huge hit
- Make Your Own iPhone
- Cisco Troubles With iPhone Trademark in Canada
- iPhone could be exclusive to Carphone Warehouse
- Researcher: iPhone is no smart phone
- Apple's 'iPhone' problems in Canada
- Researcher: iPhone no smart phone
- The iPhone is No Smartphone - Report
- iPhone: HP gets 'touchy'
- How the iPhone could have changed the cell-phone i...
- Needham: iPhone takes shine off RIM's Pearl
- Reviews the iPhone (Verdict: Groundbreaking, Expen...
- Apple: Introducing iPhone
- Apple’s iPhone touch-screen – will it work as adve...
- Toshiba eyes faster chips to win in iPhone era
- iPhone Hang-Ups
- No Cingular, no iPhone
- iPhone trademarks: the real issues
- iPhone and Apple TV for Enterprise Mac readers
- Will iPhone Mess Up Cell Phones Upgrade Cycle?
- Can iPhone game too?
- Apple in Profit with iPhone
- Cisco admits iPhone licence violation
- Apple iPhone Could Enjoy Profit Margins Over 50%
- iPhone Trademarks: the Real Issues
- Is Apple's iPhone set to conquer the world?
- iPhone To Energize Development Of Cellular Media D...
- iPhone Comparisons to LG PRADA Debate Reaches Dull...
- Apple's iPhone PK LG's Prada
- Apple iPhone courts failure with a late, defensive...
- Apple's bite: For iPhone, uPay 100% markup
- Will iPhone be for you? Here's what to expect
- Apple's iPhone a victim of telecom network limitat...
- Critics already dialing in with iPhone complaints
- Intel exec claims iPhone runs on Xscale chip
- An iPhone FAQ
- Apple iPhone FAQ_2
- Apple iPhone FAQ
- David Pogue Updates iPhone FAQ
- How'd we go from topophone to iPhone?
- Apple stands to make a bundle from iPhone
- Crave Podcast 19: The iPhone is here!
- Apple iPhone Raises the Bar for Handset Interfaces
- Microsoft to Sue Apple over iPhone
- Price cuts on Apple iPhone likely, analysis finds
- Analysts: IPhone Prices May Go Down
- Is the Google Switch mobile phone an iPhone killer?
- Apple iPhone Won't Work In Much Of Northern N.E
- IPhone a 'big letdown' for some in Northeast
- Apple set for 50% margins on iPhone, says iSuppli
- Will Apple's iPhone Measure Up to the Hype?
- iPhone accessories out already?
- The iPhone is not as clever as Steve thinks
- LG unwraps iPhone-like Prada cell phone
- Hands (and fingers) on the iPhone
- Cisco's iPhone violates GPL, expert says
- Up close with the iPhone
- Is Apple's iPhone a Technical Coup?
- iPhone fans and foes clash online
- Apple's iPhone faces hang-up in 19 states
- Microsoft CEO Takes On Apple's iPhone
- Apple Lawyers Target Blogs Covering iPhone "Skins"...
- Apple holiday sales, earnings soar, but current qu...
- Why Apple needs the iPhone (and the Mac): iPod gro...
- Apple reports record 1Q profit
- Apple iPhone: our in-depth, hands-off impressions
- Report: iPhone won't be sold in many parts of country
- Apple iPhone Won't Be Available In Vermont, N.H.
- iPhone network won't work for all
- Macworld: Will Apple Keep its iPhone Closed? Multi...
- iPhone Skins for Windows Mobile Phones & PalmOS Ke...
- Is iPhone Apple's greatest triumph or last hurrah?
- iPhone misconceptions corrected
- The widescreen iPhone -- not so widescreen
- iPhone Clone On Ebay
- Want an iPhone? Beware the iHandcuffs!
-
▼
01
(77)