Apple unveiled its new iPhone at the MacWorld show in San Francisco yesterday with a streamlined user interface that is sure to cause rumbles in the handset manufacturing community. Featuring a large 3.5” display and only one button, all of the controls will be virtual and operated through an advanced touchscreen interface.
Apple has clearly issued a challenge to other manufacturers regarding user interface and input technology. Apple CEO and co-founder Steve Jobs referred to the current crop of smartphones as “hard to use” and described the problem as being in the bottom 40% of the handset, “keyboards that are there whether you need them or not”. Apple has determined that the best alternative is to remove the keyboard entirely. This will allow for a far more flexible user interface that will be driven by the application being accessed. The iPhone virtual interface will be driven by a modified version of Apple’s OS X operating system, already seen by many as an archetype for consumer friendly interfaces.
Although it is certainly innovative and exciting, it is unclear how well the iPhone interface will stand up to the rigors of daily use. While the “big-screen” concept may work well for viewing multimedia and web content, in theory, having to constantly clean off fingerprints, makeup, and smudges may prove irritating to consumers. In addition, the daily punishment of being tossed into a purse or thrown into a pocket with car keys may prove problematic. Apple has already faced some criticism in this area with the introduction of iPod Nano, whose first generation was plagued by complaints of easily scratched and damaged polycarbonate screens. And, while an iPod screen can be easily protected by a case, it is unclear how easy it will be to shield a touchscreen from, well, contact.
Despite these concerns, the iPhone appears to be an early hit with both consumers and investors, even taking into account the fact that the first unit will not ship for another six months.
IMS Research Analyst, Bill Morelli, commented, “Apple has changed the dynamics of the handset market just with its entrance. Regardless of the impact the iPhone has in terms of unit sales, the impact on handset design and user interface will be felt for years to come”. He continued, “It is a certainty that devices offering similar design features will start cropping up from other manufacturers, similar to the influx of RAZR imitators that started appearing on the market in the latter half of 2006.”
Handset navigation has long been a source of frustration for consumers. Handset manufacturers and operators have struggled with the challenge created by squeezing more functionality into the handset without making the operation too complex. Apple has moved this debate front and center with its bold proclamation of a leapfrog device that will revolutionize the handset market.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(97)
-
▼
01
(77)
- The “iPhone” Brouhaha
- New multifeature iPhone not likely to be a huge hit
- Make Your Own iPhone
- Cisco Troubles With iPhone Trademark in Canada
- iPhone could be exclusive to Carphone Warehouse
- Researcher: iPhone is no smart phone
- Apple's 'iPhone' problems in Canada
- Researcher: iPhone no smart phone
- The iPhone is No Smartphone - Report
- iPhone: HP gets 'touchy'
- How the iPhone could have changed the cell-phone i...
- Needham: iPhone takes shine off RIM's Pearl
- Reviews the iPhone (Verdict: Groundbreaking, Expen...
- Apple: Introducing iPhone
- Apple’s iPhone touch-screen – will it work as adve...
- Toshiba eyes faster chips to win in iPhone era
- iPhone Hang-Ups
- No Cingular, no iPhone
- iPhone trademarks: the real issues
- iPhone and Apple TV for Enterprise Mac readers
- Will iPhone Mess Up Cell Phones Upgrade Cycle?
- Can iPhone game too?
- Apple in Profit with iPhone
- Cisco admits iPhone licence violation
- Apple iPhone Could Enjoy Profit Margins Over 50%
- iPhone Trademarks: the Real Issues
- Is Apple's iPhone set to conquer the world?
- iPhone To Energize Development Of Cellular Media D...
- iPhone Comparisons to LG PRADA Debate Reaches Dull...
- Apple's iPhone PK LG's Prada
- Apple iPhone courts failure with a late, defensive...
- Apple's bite: For iPhone, uPay 100% markup
- Will iPhone be for you? Here's what to expect
- Apple's iPhone a victim of telecom network limitat...
- Critics already dialing in with iPhone complaints
- Intel exec claims iPhone runs on Xscale chip
- An iPhone FAQ
- Apple iPhone FAQ_2
- Apple iPhone FAQ
- David Pogue Updates iPhone FAQ
- How'd we go from topophone to iPhone?
- Apple stands to make a bundle from iPhone
- Crave Podcast 19: The iPhone is here!
- Apple iPhone Raises the Bar for Handset Interfaces
- Microsoft to Sue Apple over iPhone
- Price cuts on Apple iPhone likely, analysis finds
- Analysts: IPhone Prices May Go Down
- Is the Google Switch mobile phone an iPhone killer?
- Apple iPhone Won't Work In Much Of Northern N.E
- IPhone a 'big letdown' for some in Northeast
- Apple set for 50% margins on iPhone, says iSuppli
- Will Apple's iPhone Measure Up to the Hype?
- iPhone accessories out already?
- The iPhone is not as clever as Steve thinks
- LG unwraps iPhone-like Prada cell phone
- Hands (and fingers) on the iPhone
- Cisco's iPhone violates GPL, expert says
- Up close with the iPhone
- Is Apple's iPhone a Technical Coup?
- iPhone fans and foes clash online
- Apple's iPhone faces hang-up in 19 states
- Microsoft CEO Takes On Apple's iPhone
- Apple Lawyers Target Blogs Covering iPhone "Skins"...
- Apple holiday sales, earnings soar, but current qu...
- Why Apple needs the iPhone (and the Mac): iPod gro...
- Apple reports record 1Q profit
- Apple iPhone: our in-depth, hands-off impressions
- Report: iPhone won't be sold in many parts of country
- Apple iPhone Won't Be Available In Vermont, N.H.
- iPhone network won't work for all
- Macworld: Will Apple Keep its iPhone Closed? Multi...
- iPhone Skins for Windows Mobile Phones & PalmOS Ke...
- Is iPhone Apple's greatest triumph or last hurrah?
- iPhone misconceptions corrected
- The widescreen iPhone -- not so widescreen
- iPhone Clone On Ebay
- Want an iPhone? Beware the iHandcuffs!
-
▼
01
(77)